Stores that were found to have violated the "variant rules" have begun to be automatically unblocked on a large scale? How should subsequent variants be played?

Most people who sell products on Amazon have violated the variant violation rules. However, the 5.10 variant violation store closure incident has recently caused a stir because the penalty for variant violation is really heavy. A small number of people received a variant violation warning, and the vast majority of variant violation cases will receive a complaint box:

From May 10th to May 15th, the sellers who received store closure letters due to variant violations were extremely anxious and didn't know what to do; the sellers who did not receive any store closure letters were trembling with fear and treading on thin ice, quietly waiting for the store closure letters.

But early this morning, a seller received good news. The store that was blocked due to the violation of the email variant was unblocked. It was really a great joy, and it felt like a life-saving experience:



The sellers whose stores were restored did not do anything, and were automatically unblocked. I carefully looked at several groups again, and they were all in an uproar. Everyone was discussing the unblocking of stores that violated the regulations:




At present, many sellers have been automatically unblocked, and a large area of ​​suspected misjudgment has been restored. Although it has been restored, it is recommended that you do not make illegal mergers in the near future to prevent complications. Has your variant store been restored from illegal closure? Welcome to leave a message below to discuss!

"Wonderful Reply"

Anonymous user

It is not recommended to find a service provider for this variant of illegal account blocking. Most of them will be unblocked slowly. Don't be too scared, just wait and see.

Purpose:
1. Clean up and standardize the Amazon shopping environment. Taobao is not doing well in this regard. There are many irrelevant or even obviously deceptive traffic diversion variations, which makes the shopping experience very poor. Amazon should want to avoid this trend.
 
2. Increase revenue. If Amazon only uses old customers to bring in new customers, it will lose a lot of advertising fees.
 
3. Give new products and small sellers opportunities. Avoid Lao Mai and Damai from monopolizing categories by bringing in new customers.
 
Four stages: Stage 1: Amazon has limited manpower, and it is unrealistic for their team to check links one by one. Therefore, in the early stage, thunderous measures, performance + closing stores, deter all sellers from being in awe. There will definitely be accidental killings in this stage, which is also the nature of Amazon.
 
Phase 2: Sellers began to panic, started self-examination and self-correction, and took the initiative to remove illegal links. Amazon achieved a multiplier effect with little effort.
 
Phase Three: The deterrent effect is basically achieved, and the relevant teams gradually free up their hands to review the stores that were mistakenly killed. As long as they are not serious and repeated violations, they will basically be unblocked slowly.
 
Phase 4: Amazon withdrew its global rectification and began regular but low-intensity spot checks and machine scans.
 
A few questions:
1. Do you want to find a service provider? I don’t recommend it. Unless you have internal connections, it’s nothing more than a complaint. There is no room for technical operations. Moreover, in the early stages of each major operation, Amazon first mistakenly kills a thousand sellers and then corrects the mistake. It’s useless to do anything before the time is up. When the time is up, they will just unblock you casually. So it’s not the credit of the service provider, but the time is up. Before the rules are clear, the service providers are also guessing, but they have a large number of sellers to try more. For example, the consumer law that just came out last year almost sentenced individual sellers to death at the beginning, but Amazon later gave a solution. Seeking medical treatment in a hurry may be counterproductive ( disclaimer: I am not denying the role of service providers. Sellers still need service providers in many cases, but I don’t recommend it this time ).
 
2. Are there any other variants that violate the rules that need to be removed? Severe violations are recommended for removal. Ambiguous and less serious ones are recommended for observation and not removal.
 
3. Can we still build ambiguous links in the future? I think we can, as long as they are not serious violations. If we want to completely follow Amazon's requirements, it is basically impossible to do it. In fact, once the storm has passed, the follow-up will be thunder and rain, as long as you don't do it too recklessly.
 
Conclusion: Don't be too scared. Let the bullets fly for a while.

Hao

Now on a certain audio platform, many live broadcasts say that the video has been automatically restored. I don’t know what’s going on. What are the possible reasons for the automatic restoration?
1. Amazon itself can’t stand it anymore. Originally, consumers could find various products by entering a link, but now they have to look for products everywhere, resulting in low conversion rate and poor experience. It seems that Amazon still focuses on its own interests.
2. After scanning the number, it is found that the judgment conditions set are too strict, and remediation is done afterwards.

Storm Baby 2

I tried to use the template again to merge the split variants in compliance, and was half successful, but failed with error code 8040 (the error code a few days ago was 2036). Is there anyone who has successfully recovered who can come out and share how to deal with it?

peter_hn43

Agree with: NoMore

8040 reported an error. The bad thing is that I succeeded in merging the sub-variant of 8040, but not the others. I dare not try 8040 now. Is there any successful expert who can tell me?