The merchant link purchased through the service provider was compromised

Many sellers said that the stores they were reviewed for the second time were those that they registered by purchasing links (only part of the screenshots are included, but there are indeed quite a few sellers in this situation, so please don’t bother me if you are picky)

Some sellers also reported that they purchased the link from a service provider in July and registered, but the number was gone just after they signed for the goods.

         ▲ The picture comes from the seller communication group (click to see the big picture)      

Some sellers also said that they had received information that in the past two months, many personal marketing accounts have been promoting that doing business on Amazon is like making money, causing many people to rush in to apply for accounts and get severely ripped off.

The sellers then discussed the links in the service provider's hands: although there was no problem with the seller's own information, there was a problem with the investment link.

In response to this, the sellers also complained about the service providers...

Seller A: The service provider gave me the link, Amazon closed the store, and the service provider provided a one-stop complaint service.

Seller B: Still the familiar recipe, still the familiar taste.

Today, service providers have begun to undertake the business of “guaranteeing passing the second review”.

       

  ▲ The picture comes from the seller communication group (click to see the big picture)      

So where do the service providers get the investment links?

A seller shared the following screenshot of WeChat Moments↓↓↓

The screenshot shows that the external investment link is reversed through a real investment link to the corresponding email address, and then

Send emails under Kali using swaks disguised as [email protected]...

Bloggers also did some popular science about swaks

Interested sellers can learn more ↓↓↓

  ▲ The picture comes from @四维搬砖工

Regarding sending emails disguised as [email protected], we also mentioned this in our previous article "Account registration is tightened, but service providers can still use offline links! What is the origin of this?"

As we all know, the investment manager link from the formal channels is the manager's email address, name + suffix, but some service providers show [email protected]

Another seller complained to the customer service: He bought the registration link of the investment manager from the service provider, and one link cost several hundred yuan. After receiving the link, the service provider disappeared...

Nowadays, the price of investment links in the hands of service providers has risen from 200-300 yuan to 800 yuan. Some sellers even told me that they asked for 1,500 yuan for a link on Taobao.

▲ The picture comes from the seller communication group      

In short, to put it in simple terms: some service providers used black technology to forge investment manager links to make profits. Now that they have been detected by the Amazon system, they will naturally start to clean up, so sellers who purchased links from service providers have encountered a second review.

Amazon will conduct a unified second review of accounts from July to August

I believe that from yesterday to today, many sellers have seen this message in their circle of friends.

The news indicated that Amazon had officially taken measures to trigger a second review for all first-instance numbers from July to August 14. This action was official and all sellers’ numbers in the market were facing the same problem. It was not a problem with individual information or the account itself. The same was true for customers’ own information.

To sum it up in one sentence, Amazon will trigger a second review for all first-instance numbers before July or August 14.

Some sellers said: This is just a public relations response from those fake link service providers.

However, some sellers in the seller communication group also said: It’s not the purchased link that has a problem, but the first-instance store purchased was subject to a second review.

  ▲ The picture comes from the seller communication group      

There are also sellers who said: All the first-instance numbers they bought triggered the second-instance numbers, but all the second-instance numbers they bought were fine.

  ▲ The picture comes from the seller communication group      

Therefore, the statement that "Amazon conducts a second review of the first-instance numbers" has certain basis.

Finally, the editor concludes that this large-scale second trial is the result of irregular operations . The operation of the brother-in-law settling accounts after the event is commonplace for veteran sellers. The newbies who just entered Amazon were not only cut off by the service providers, but also ended up with nothing. I feel deeply sad about this...

Of course, regarding this large-scale second review, sellers must have a lot to say, discuss, and even compare their misery.

We have created an [8.14 Asia-America Second-Instance Review Group to Share Misery] , and sellers who have encountered the second-instance review are welcome to scan the QR code and join the group.