A woman was raped at a job party, and the criminal was from this cross-border logistics company!

During the peak season every year, news and gossip related to the cross-border industry are always emerging, and many of the events are shocking.

I still remember the recent murder case in Zhan Tao Building, Longhua, Shenzhen, which made people feel scared and introspective. In recent days, the incident in which a seller was threatened by an unscrupulous evaluation service provider has also aroused heated discussions among sellers, making many sellers angry.

▲ Screenshot from Weibo @跨交电商

However, the above incidents were only widely circulated in the cross-border circle, and the incident that this article is going to talk about today can be said to have caused a sensation on the entire Internet.

Recently, the topic #First-instance verdict in the case of a woman being raped at a job party# became a hot search, sparking heated discussions among netizens.

▲ Screenshot from Weibo

Let me take you through the whole process of this case:

So what is the connection between this incident and the cross-border circle? This has to do with the cross-border logistics company B where the criminal worked.

Both the criminal and the victim worked for B International Logistics (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. According to Tianyancha, the company's registered capital is 5 million yuan, and it mainly operates international logistics and transportation business. Its official website claims to be a powerful Russian overseas warehouse.

▲ Screenshot from Weibo @天眼查

It is reported that the victim initially applied for a job at company B Overseas Warehouse, where he worked as a freight forwarding clerk. His actual job was to find customers for company B Overseas Warehouse on AliExpress.

▲ The recruiting company is shown as A Logistics Company, and the profile picture is B Overseas Warehouse

▲ Screenshot from @Vista Business Research Institute   Weibo post on May 21

In fact, seeing this, everyone can understand the relationship between Logistics Company A and Overseas Warehouse B.

According to the victim's partner: On May 14, the team leader of the logistics company initiated a forced dinner on May 15. The victim was then raped by the criminal.

On the second day after the incident, the victim asked in the company group where the criminal was sent. The company did not respond at all and removed the victim from the company group chat.

On May 23, the seventh day after the incident, the victim, accompanied by a lawyer, went to the logistics company to negotiate and demanded that the company publicly apologize for its negligent management and inaction. On the same day, B Overseas Warehouse Co., Ltd. issued a solemn statement on its official website, denying that the parties were its employees. According to the victim's partner, the company did not fire the criminal or impose any punishment that day.

On the 9th day, May 26, A Logistics Co., Ltd. issued an apology statement and stated that the company actively arranged for vacation and actively inquired after the incident. Later, the victim's partner said that the statement evaded the main point and went to the company to retrieve the victim's personal information on the fifth day of the incident. When demanding an apology, the person in charge at the time still questioned the victim why he spread public opinion online.

▲ Screenshot from Weibo @天眼查

Later, the victim's partner said that after the victim visited the company, Company B overseas warehouse tore off the B overseas warehouse logistics logo outside the company's door and changed it to the A logistics logo.

▲ Screenshot from the victim’s partner

In short, the victim's partner said that after the incident, the company did not punish the relevant employees in a timely manner, but instead removed the victim from the group chat and began to change the logo, pass the buck, and other operations.

After the first-instance judgment of this case, some netizens expressed the views that "it's only been three and a half years" and "such people and companies are too shameless . "

▲ Screenshot from Weibo

The blogger on the homepage of @跨跨电商Weibo also expressed the following views on the logistics company involved in this case↓↓↓

▲ Screenshot from Weibo

It can be seen that the attitudes of the above bloggers are all consistent in boycotting this logistics company.

It is inevitable to ask: If cross-border sellers encounter this cross-border logistics company, will they still cooperate with it in related business? Welcome to discuss in the comment area.

Finally, I would like to remind all sellers: Logistics can be said to be the backbone of cross-border e-commerce. When looking for logistics companies, sellers must choose regular logistics companies and examine aspects including credibility, freight, safety, delivery speed, whether there are tariffs, service attitude, etc. before making a final choice.

Disclaimer: The quotations in this article are based on facts and do not have any stance. Please do not over-interpret.